This year’s Giants aren’t shuffling through minor-leaguers at a much greater rate than last year. That kind of thing.Īgain, this is mostly even, with the 2019 Giants having a bit of an edge:Ģ018 players contracts selected or recalled from the minors: 45Ģ019 players contracts selected or recalled from the minors: 53 All of a sudden, you look up and, whoa, Zach Green or Donovan Solano is here. It was a little too confusing to count players who were optioned, because rehab assignments messed with the tally, so we’ll go with players who were added to the roster. In other words: players getting called up to the major-league roster. The Giants have been good at it in the past, though, and there’s every reason to hope they’ll continue to be good at it for the foreseeable future.
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS TRANSACTIONS FREE
Every team is culling through the free bin and looking for ways to bolster their depth. This isn’t something unique to the Giants. So considering all that, it’s not surprising that when it comes to minor-league free agents, it’s pretty much even between the two teams: The lowest ERA in San Francisco Giants history belongs to a minor-league free agent, you know. Ryan Vogelsong went from “guy who gets referenced in a Brisbee column about random trades from 20 years ago” to the personification of just how silly and fun the last decade has been.
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS TRANSACTIONS SERIES
Gregor Blanco was so good that the Giants could win a World Series after one of their best players was suspended for performance-enhancing drugs. Andrés Torres had one of the greatest non-Mays seasons from a center fielder in the history of the franchise. Maybe! But framing those success stories like that ignores the contributions the Giants already squeezed out of minor-league free agents. Were the Giants going to get their own Muncy out of an ocean of free-agent talent? With Zaidi as GM, the Dodgers got Chris Taylor and Max Muncy for free. The Giants’ relative success with minor-league free agents is underrated, and the difference in perception was heightened when Zaidi came over. I looked from October 2017 through August 2018, and then I compared that year of transactions with the ones from October 2018 through August 2019, which is roughly the beginning of the Zaidi era. Do you remember the 12 days that Luis Figueroa was on the roster in 2007? I do now.īut the differences aren’t just about transactions increasing across the board. To figure this out, I exposed myself to one of the internet’s greatest time sinks, the MLB official transaction page, which goes all the way back to 2001.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/69267162/1317378436.0.jpg "san francisco giants transactions")
I’m counting only one Dull moment since Zaidi took over. They are making more transactions than we’re used to. After the latest saga with a pair of major-league relievers - Ryan Dull and Kyle Barraclough were both claimed on waivers and designated for assignment within the same week - I wanted to know if the Giants were actually making more transactions than we’re used to, or if I was just experiencing recency bias. Or, to be more exact, welcome to the Giants in the Farhan Zaidi era. They’ve designated 32 players for assignment since January. In the year 2019, the Giants also designated six players for assignment. The Giants needed space on the 40-man roster throughout the 2009 season, and those were the six players they were willing to expose to waivers. Because I’m a sucker for old friends, I’m obligated to list these players: Pat Misch, Steve Holm, Billy Sadler, Ryan Sadowski, Jesse English and Osiris Matos. In the year 2009, the Giants designated six players for assignment.
0 kommentar(er)
